Small baseline datasets are commonly used to quickly test and benchmark machine learning models, especially during the early stages of development. Some famous small baseline datasets include:
Iris dataset: A classic dataset in the field of pattern recognition and machine learning, the Iris dataset contains 150 samples of iris flowers from three different species. Each sample has four features: sepal length, sepal width, petal length, and petal width.
Wine dataset: This dataset contains 178 samples of wine, with 13 features related to their chemical composition. The wines belong to three different classes, and the task is to predict the class based on the features.
Breast Cancer Wisconsin (Diagnostic) dataset: This dataset contains 569 samples of cell nuclei from breast mass images, with 30 features computed from each sample. The task is to classify the samples as either benign or malignant.
Boston Housing dataset: This dataset consists of 506 samples of housing data in the Boston area, with 13 features representing various aspects of the houses and their neighborhoods. The task is to predict the median value of owner-occupied homes.
MNIST dataset: A widely used dataset for image classification tasks, the MNIST dataset contains 70,000 handwritten digit images (28x28 pixels) from 0 to 9. Although not as small as the other datasets mentioned, it's still considered a small dataset compared to many others used in deep learning.
CIFAR-10 dataset: This dataset contains 60,000 32x32 color images in 10 classes, with 6,000 images per class. There are 50,000 training images and 10,000 test images. The task is to classify the images into the appropriate class.
These datasets are popular due to their simplicity and size, making them suitable for rapid experimentation and initial evaluation of machine learning models.
This data represents the Boston Housing dataset, which consists of information about the housing market in Boston, Massachusetts. Each row corresponds to a different suburb or town, and the columns represent various features of the housing market and the area.
The columns are as follows:
- crim: per capita crime rate by town
- zn: proportion of residential land zoned for lots over 25,000 sq.ft.
- indus: proportion of non-retail business acres per town
- chas: Charles River dummy variable (= 1 if tract bounds river; 0 otherwise)
- nox: nitrogen oxide concentration (parts per 10 million)
- rm: average number of rooms per dwelling
- age: proportion of owner-occupied units built prior to 1940
- dis: weighted mean of distances to five Boston employment centers
- rad: index of accessibility to radial highways
- tax: full-value property tax rate per $10,000
- ptratio: pupil-teacher ratio by town
- b: 1000(Bk - 0.63)^2, where Bk is the proportion of black people by town
- lstat: lower status of the population (percent)
- medv: median value of owner-occupied homes in $1000s
For example, the first row of data can be interpreted as follows:
- crim: 0.00632 (low crime rate)
- zn: 18 (18% of land zoned for large lots)
- indus: 2.31 (low proportion of non-retail business acres)
- chas: 0 (not adjacent to the Charles River)
- nox: 0.538 (moderate nitrogen oxide concentration)
- rm: 6.575 (average number of rooms per dwelling)
- age: 65.2 (65.2% of homes built before 1940)
- dis: 4.09 (average distance to employment centers)
- rad: 1 (low accessibility to highways)
- tax: 296 (property tax rate of $296 per $10,000)
- ptratio: 15.3 (pupil-teacher ratio in the town)
- b: 396.9 (high proportion of black residents)
- lstat: 4.98 (low percentage of lower status population)
- medv: 24 (median home value of $24,000)
Keep in mind that this dataset was collected in the 1970s, so the values, especially for house prices, may not reflect the current housing market.
There are many interesting questions one could explore using the Boston Housing dataset. Some examples include:
- What is the relationship between crime rate and housing prices?
- How does the proximity to the Charles River affect housing prices?
- Are there any correlations between air pollution (nox) and housing prices?
- How do factors such as the average number of rooms per dwelling (rm), property tax rate (tax), and pupil-teacher ratio (ptratio) influence housing prices?
- What is the impact of the proportion of lower status population (lstat) on housing prices?
- Are there any geographical patterns in the distribution of housing prices or other features across the towns?
- How does the age of houses in a town affect housing prices?
- Can a predictive model be built to estimate housing prices based on the other features in the dataset?
- How do the accessibility to radial highways (rad) and distances to employment centers (dis) impact housing prices?
- Is there a relationship between the racial composition of a town (b) and housing prices or other socioeconomic factors?
These questions could lead to interesting insights about the factors that influence housing prices and provide a better understanding of the Boston housing market during the time the dataset was collected. Analyzing this data could also help inform urban planning and policy decisions.
Question 1: What is the relationship between crime rate and housing prices?
To answer this question, you can follow these steps:
- Import the dataset: Read the dataset into a suitable data structure, such as a pandas DataFrame in Python.
pythonimport pandas as pd
column_names = ["crim", "zn", "indus", "chas", "nox", "rm", "age", "dis", "rad", "tax", "ptratio", "b", "lstat", "medv"]
data = pd.read_csv("boston_housing_data.csv", names=column_names)
- Visualize the relationship: Create a scatter plot to visualize the relationship between crime rate (crim) and housing prices (medv).
pythonimport matplotlib.pyplot as plt
plt.scatter(data["crim"], data["medv"], alpha=0.5)
plt.xlabel("Crime rate")
plt.ylabel("Median value of owner-occupied homes ($1000s)")
plt.title("Crime rate vs. Housing prices")
plt.show()
- Calculate the correlation: Compute the correlation coefficient between crime rate and housing prices to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship.
pythoncorrelation = data["crim"].corr(data["medv"])
print(f"Correlation between crime rate and housing prices: {correlation:.2f}")
Interpret the results: Based on the visualization and correlation coefficient, determine whether there is a significant relationship between crime rate and housing prices. A negative correlation would suggest that housing prices tend to be lower in areas with higher crime rates, while a positive correlation would indicate the opposite. A correlation close to zero would imply that there is little to no relationship between the two variables.
(Optional) Build a regression model: If you find a significant relationship between crime rate and housing prices, you could build a simple linear regression model to predict housing prices based on crime rate. This would allow you to quantify the impact of crime rate on housing prices more precisely.
pythonfrom sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression
X = data[["crim"]]
y = data["medv"]
model = LinearRegression()
model.fit(X, y)
- (Optional) Evaluate the model: Assess the performance of the regression model using appropriate evaluation metrics such as R-squared, mean squared error (MSE), or mean absolute error (MAE).
pythonfrom sklearn.metrics import r2_score, mean_squared_error, mean_absolute_error
y_pred = model.predict(X)
r2 = r2_score(y, y_pred)
mse = mean_squared_error(y, y_pred)
mae = mean_absolute_error(y, y_pred)
print(f"R-squared: {r2:.2f}")
print(f"Mean squared error: {mse:.2f}")
print(f"Mean absolute error: {mae:.2f}")
Following these steps will help you explore the relationship between crime rate and housing prices in the Boston Housing dataset.
In addition to the steps described earlier, you may consider the following insights and additional analyses when exploring the relationship between crime rate and housing prices:
Outliers: Investigate any outliers in the data that could be affecting the relationship between crime rate and housing prices. Outliers might be due to data entry errors or represent unique cases that should be treated separately.
Non-linear relationship: The relationship between crime rate and housing prices might not be linear. Consider using non-linear regression techniques, such as polynomial regression, to capture more complex relationships between the variables.
Confounding variables: Other variables in the dataset might be affecting both crime rate and housing prices, leading to a spurious relationship between the two. Analyzing the relationship between crime rate and housing prices while controlling for other relevant factors (e.g., socioeconomic status, accessibility to employment centers) can help you better understand the true relationship between these variables.
Spatial patterns: Analyze the spatial distribution of crime rates and housing prices to identify any geographic patterns. This could reveal insights about the impact of crime rates on housing prices in different areas or neighborhoods.
Temporal trends: While the Boston Housing dataset is a snapshot in time, exploring changes in crime rates and housing prices over time can help you understand the long-term impact of crime on housing prices.
Comparisons with other cities: Compare the relationship between crime rate and housing prices in Boston with other cities to determine if the observed relationship is unique to Boston or generalizable to other urban areas.
Causality: Keep in mind that correlation does not imply causation. A significant relationship between crime rate and housing prices might not necessarily mean that crime rate directly causes changes in housing prices. Further analyses, such as time-series data or causal inference techniques, may be necessary to establish a causal relationship.
Considering these additional insights and analyses can help you gain a deeper understanding of the relationship between crime rate and housing prices in the Boston Housing dataset.
To analyze the impact of outliers on the relationship between crime rate and housing prices, follow these steps:
Visualize outliers: Create a scatter plot to visualize the relationship between crime rate (crim) and housing prices (medv), as shown in the previous response. Carefully inspect the plot to identify any potential outliers that might be affecting the relationship between the two variables.
Remove outliers: Determine a criterion to identify outliers in the data. For example, you could use the IQR (interquartile range) method or Z-score to detect extreme values. After identifying outliers, remove them from the dataset.
Here's an example of how to remove outliers using the IQR method:
pythonQ1 = data["crim"].quantile(0.25)
Q3 = data["crim"].quantile(0.75)
IQR = Q3 - Q1
lower_bound = Q1 - 1.5 * IQR
upper_bound = Q3 + 1.5 * IQR
# Filter the data to exclude outliers
data_filtered = data[(data["crim"] >= lower_bound) & (data["crim"] <= upper_bound)]
- Re-visualize the relationship: Create a new scatter plot with the filtered dataset to visualize the relationship between crime rate and housing prices without the outliers.
pythonplt.scatter(data_filtered["crim"], data_filtered["medv"], alpha=0.5)
plt.xlabel("Crime rate")
plt.ylabel("Median value of owner-occupied homes ($1000s)")
plt.title("Crime rate vs. Housing prices (without outliers)")
plt.show()
- Re-calculate the correlation: Compute the correlation coefficient between crime rate and housing prices using the filtered dataset.
pythoncorrelation_filtered = data_filtered["crim"].corr(data_filtered["medv"])
print(f"Correlation between crime rate and housing prices (without outliers): {correlation_filtered:.2f}")
- Interpret the results: Compare the correlation coefficient and scatter plot from the filtered dataset with those from the original dataset. If the correlation coefficient changes significantly or the scatter plot appears substantially different, it might suggest that outliers were affecting the relationship between crime rate and housing prices.
By examining the impact of outliers, you can gain a more accurate understanding of the relationship between crime rate and housing prices in the Boston Housing dataset.
To answer the question of how proximity to the Charles River affects housing prices, follow these steps:
- Import the dataset: Read the dataset into a suitable data structure, such as a pandas DataFrame in Python, if you haven't already.
pythonimport pandas as pd
column_names = ["crim", "zn", "indus", "chas", "nox", "rm", "age", "dis", "rad", "tax", "ptratio", "b", "lstat", "medv"]
data = pd.read_csv("boston_housing_data.csv", names=column_names)
- Group data by proximity to the Charles River: Divide the dataset into two groups based on whether the property is adjacent to the Charles River (chas = 1) or not (chas = 0).
pythonnear_river = data[data["chas"] == 1]
away_from_river = data[data["chas"] == 0]
- Calculate average housing prices for each group: Compute the average median value of owner-occupied homes (medv) for properties near the river and away from the river.
pythonavg_price_near_river = near_river["medv"].mean()
avg_price_away_from_river = away_from_river["medv"].mean()
print(f"Average housing price near Charles River: ${avg_price_near_river * 1000:.2f}")
print(f"Average housing price away from Charles River: ${avg_price_away_from_river * 1000:.2f}")
- Visualize the data: Create a box plot or violin plot to compare the distribution of housing prices for properties near the river and away from the river.
pythonimport seaborn as sns
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
sns.boxplot(x="chas", y="medv", data=data)
plt.xlabel("Proximity to Charles River (1 = near, 0 = away)")
plt.ylabel("Median value of owner-occupied homes ($1000s)")
plt.title("Housing prices by proximity to Charles River")
plt.show()
- Perform a hypothesis test: Conduct an appropriate statistical test, such as an independent two-sample t-test, to determine whether the difference in average housing prices between the two groups is statistically significant.
pythonfrom scipy.stats import ttest_ind
t_stat, p_value = ttest_ind(near_river["medv"], away_from_river["medv"])
print(f"T-statistic: {t_stat:.2f}")
print(f"P-value: {p_value:.5f}")
- Interpret the results: Based on the visualization and hypothesis test, determine if there is a significant difference in housing prices between properties near the Charles River and those away from it. A low p-value (typically below 0.05) would indicate that there is a significant difference in housing prices based on the proximity to the Charles River.
Following these steps will help you explore the impact of proximity to the Charles River on housing prices in the Boston Housing dataset.
To explore the impact of proximity to the Charles River on housing prices more deeply, consider the following additional analyses:
- Control for confounding variables: Other variables in the dataset might be affecting both proximity to the Charles River and housing prices, leading to a spurious relationship between the two. Perform a multivariate regression analysis to control for potential confounding variables, such as crime rate, average number of rooms, and pupil-teacher ratio.
pythonimport statsmodels.api as sm
X = data[["chas", "crim", "rm", "ptratio"]]
X = sm.add_constant(X)
y = data["medv"]
model = sm.OLS(y, X).fit()
print(model.summary())
Investigate interaction effects: Examine whether the effect of proximity to the Charles River on housing prices depends on other factors, such as the socioeconomic status of the neighborhood or the distance to employment centers. Include interaction terms in the multivariate regression analysis to explore these potential effects.
Compare property types: Analyze the relationship between proximity to the Charles River and housing prices separately for different property types, such as single-family homes, multi-family homes, and apartments. This could reveal insights about the preferences of different types of home buyers.
Analyze spatial patterns: Investigate the geographic distribution of properties near and away from the Charles River to identify any spatial patterns or trends. This could provide insights into the underlying factors driving the observed relationship between proximity to the river and housing prices.
Temporal trends: If you have access to historical data, analyze the relationship between proximity to the Charles River and housing prices over time to identify any long-term trends or changes in preferences.
Compare with other cities: Compare the relationship between proximity to water bodies and housing prices in Boston with other cities to determine if the observed relationship is unique to Boston or generalizable to other urban areas.
Qualitative analysis: Conduct qualitative research, such as interviews with real estate agents or homeowners, to gain insights into the preferences and motivations of home buyers when considering properties near the Charles River.
By incorporating these additional analyses, you can gain a deeper understanding of the relationship between proximity to the Charles River and housing prices in the Boston Housing dataset.
To analyze the relationship between proximity to the Charles River and housing prices separately for different property types, you would need additional data on property types, as the Boston Housing dataset does not contain this information. Assuming you have access to such data, follow these steps:
- Merge property type data with the Boston Housing dataset: Merge the property type data with the existing dataset based on a common key, such as property ID.
python# Assuming you have a DataFrame called 'property_types' with a common key 'property_id'
data_merged = data.merge(property_types, on="property_id")
- Group data by property type and proximity to the Charles River: Divide the merged dataset into groups based on property type (e.g., single-family homes, multi-family homes, apartments) and whether the property is adjacent to the Charles River (chas = 1) or not (chas = 0).
pythongrouped_data = data_merged.groupby(["property_type", "chas"])
- Calculate average housing prices for each group: Compute the average median value of owner-occupied homes (medv) for each group.
pythonavg_prices_by_type_and_proximity = grouped_data["medv"].mean()
print(avg_prices_by_type_and_proximity)
- Visualize the data: Create a grouped box plot or violin plot to compare the distribution of housing prices for properties near the river and away from the river across different property types.
pythonsns.boxplot(x="property_type", y="medv", hue="chas", data=data_merged)
plt.xlabel("Property Type")
plt.ylabel("Median value of owner-occupied homes ($1000s)")
plt.title("Housing prices by proximity to Charles River across property types")
plt.legend(title="Proximity to Charles River", loc="upper right", labels=["Away", "Near"])
plt.show()
Perform hypothesis tests: Conduct appropriate statistical tests, such as independent two-sample t-tests or ANOVA, to determine whether the differences in average housing prices between properties near the Charles River and those away from it are statistically significant for each property type.
Interpret the results: Based on the visualizations and hypothesis tests, determine if there are significant differences in housing prices between properties near the Charles River and those away from it for different property types. This analysis can help you understand whether the impact of proximity to the Charles River on housing prices varies across property types.
By following these steps, you can analyze the relationship between proximity to the Charles River and housing prices separately for different property types, provided you have access to the necessary property type data.
Add to Chrome - It's free
Add to Firefox - It's free
Add to Edge - It's free